This blog is for my future and past info and reviews on various tech stuff….
 Watches, bands & rings |
 Phones / Phablets |
 Compact cameras |
 Reviews |
 Resolution and Noise |
 Batteries and usage |
 PC & Code |
 Various tech stuff |
 Math |
 Other stuff |
Newer reviews can be expected to be ongoing projects, with minor additions or corrections.
Note: When I rate stuff, a 10/10 does not indicate perfect in an absolute academic sense, but as in (at least) as good as could be expected at the time, minor flaws allowed. For portable devices typically limited by the size and weight. Value for money also counts. An electronic device that got a high score in 2005, most likely would seem like pure trash ten years later….
2026-05-11. After using Discus for many years, and using an ad-blocker, I only recently noticed all its ads, so now switching to WpDiscuz.
- NX31, new ‘thinish’ crappy smartwatchContinue reading...</p> <p> </p> <p>
I have just become aware of (and ordered) the NX31. In the image here I have de-faked the dials back with a 86% factor!
I had edited this posts a few times but it is not worthy a full review, not recommended!
- Hybrid watch with a clever twist. Project on its way. TimeFlixContinue reading...</p> <p> </p> <p>
A new type of hybrid with partial hands only, for less blocking of the display!
The idea is two rotating discs with florescent hand-parts over a normal colour smartwatch display.
- H06, ø41mm, 6.9 or 7.3mm thin, 1.32″ smart watch. ReviewContinue reading...</p> <p> </p> <p>
High value for small money…., has become my new daily driver! Used for half a year. 3 weeks per charge.
It exists in both a 6.9 and 7.3mm version, with different top glass, ø41.0mm (and a wider ø51.4mm variant too, see this)
(Real life with a Titanium band added) - A 7.3mm thin large ø51.4mm 1.75″ smartwatch, GX03, reviewContinue reading...</p> <p> </p> <p>
I stumpled upon a much wider variant of the one I favourably reviewed as H06
In this image I have de-faked the display back to its real dimensions! (91% of advertisement fakes)
- QS36 Not as advertised! Disappointed quick reviewContinue reading...</p> <p> </p> <p>
A watch with nice design details, though substantially thicker than advertised
Blog in English (well sort of, bare with me, non-native…), a few earlier than 2010 are just blunt copies of the source texts in Danish – Google translate helps here….
Collecting of old stuff started May 2015. Entries are generally attempted dated with original stamps, even if they are somewhat updated since, several reviews have been ongoing ‘projects’.
atleast show the courtesy to explain . . why you blocked me in the first place. .
Aloha! You got your own website?
Aloha! 🙂
Yeah,. I finally pulled my self together, and gathered some of the old stuff I’ve posted, starting a couple of weeks ago.
The camera reviews were originally posted on a once great Norwegian site (akam.no) that is now dwindling and dying as a tiny unattended corner of a larger tech site, So I thought I’d better save the stuff before it was too late and they closed it completely. *G*
Unfortunately I never did reviews on my first four digital cameras (Pentax Optio S , S4, S5i and the legendary FujiFilm F30 that was the lo light king among compacts for years) – but who would care in 2015 anyway *LOL*
Wow good move…Will we see any content about mobile & other tech?
Could be. I haven’t planned any, but you never know.
Maybe I will add some small ones also, where I link to others reviews also. My monitor is certainly worth a bit of ‘advertising’.
ADD: http://eskerahn.dk/wordpress/?p=571